Continued from Part 1
Bringing in the Scientists
Dr. F. Robert Wake of Carleton University was already a prominent figure in forensic circles with his work in juvenile delinquency and deviancy. As the first chair of Carleton's Psychology Department as well as a researcher for the Royal Commission on the Criminal Law Relating to Criminal Sexual Psychopaths during the 1950s, he was well-known to security agencies and seemed ideal for developing a better way of finding hidden homosexuals. Since prevailing psychological and psychiatric thinking at the time maintained that homosexuals were either mentally ill or psychologically abnormal, depending on mental health professionals to identify closeted homosexuals in the public service made good sense. With funding from National Health and Welfare, Dr. Wake traveled to the United States to research methods used there to find a more "scientific" means of identifying homosexuals. Since RCMP investigations of suspected homosexuals were long and expensive, a more direct procedure was needed. In a 1962 "Report on Special Project", Dr. Wake restated his own opinion that homosexuals were intrinsically unsuited for employment in the public service due to their mental instability and general unreliability. Although he was already aware of Evelyn Hooker and her research disputing prevailing opinions that homosexuals were maladjusted, Dr. Wake was very much a traditionalist. In explaining what caused the difference types of homosexuality that he discussed in his report, Dr. Wake argued that homosexual tendencies were produced by “a combination of environmental circumstances during the years of childhood or early youth”.
Since there was no way of curing homosexuals based on prevailing medical science, he argued that their sexual desires needed to be controlled through medication and aversion therapy. While he focused on male homosexuality in his report, he also included information on lesbians as well and largely drew on the Kinsey results as an estimate on the actual number of homosexuals likely to exist in the Public Service. The most far-reaching part of his report was included under the heading of "Methods for Identifying Homosexuals". Arguing that there was more than one homosexual type, he ruled out the possible of a single test for identifying homosexuals. Carefully outlining the various methods used in the United States, including psychiatric interviews, medical examinations, and projective tests, he then discussed the different physiological tests or measuring sexual arousal.
After ruling out the polygraph as having too many problems to be useful, Dr. Wake also considered the finger plethysmograph (measuring blood volume in the finger using a pneumatic tube), palmar sweat index measures (perspiration), and pupillary response tests. In his comprehensive report, F.R. Wake proposed the development of a formal test of homosexuality (or, as he termed it, “suitability for employment”) using physiological measures of arousal. And, thus, the “fruit machine project” was launched.
The Rise and Fall of the “Fruit Machine”
According to John Sawatsky, author of Men in the Shadows, the term “fruit machine” was coined by RCMP agents who were leery of being recruited to act as the “normative sample” in testing the proposed device. Although the “fruit machine” was never actually developed, the project spearheaded by Wake was financed by the National Defense and Health and Welfare departments for four years. Along with Dr. Wake, the project would eventually bring in a large team of psychiatrists, psychologists, and other researchers, all dedicated to creating a machine for diagnosing homosexuality better than any of the existing methods.
Although descriptions of the methodology proposed by Wake is fairly limited in the surviving documents related to his project, the machine was apparently meant to measure changes in pupil dilation in conjunction with a word association test using a list of words with a hidden homosexual meaning. The proposed word list would include words such as: queen, circus, gay, bagpipe, bell, whole, blind, bull, camp, coo, cruise, drag, dike (dyke), fish, flute, fruit, mother, punk, queer, tea room, etc. Since many of the words had a double meaning that men and women immersed in the homosexual subculture would presumably know, measuring their physiological responses would presumably expose their hidden sexual identity. The pupillary measure that Dr. Wake recommended in his report had been developed at the University of Chicago by two researchers, Eckhard Hess and James Polt. A graduate student, Alan Seltzer had used the Hess-Polt procedure with slides comparing nearly-nude pictures of men taken from bodybuilding magazines with “neutral” slides (paintings) and claimed to be able to tell homosexual from heterosexual subjects based on pupil dilation data alone. As Dr. Wake argued in his report, pupillary response measures were ideal in catching homosexuals since pupil dilation was completely involuntary and “cannot be controlled by the subject”. He was especially impressed by the report of one homosexual subject who had admitted to trying to fool the machine only to find that he could not.
In developing his own homosexuality-detection device, Dr. Wake proposed a new experiment combining the Hess-Polt apparatus “with a suitable visual stimuli; a measure of skin perspiration… with a modification to measure pulse rate. Subjects: fifteen normal males, fifteen normal females, fifteen homosexual males, fifteen homosexual females. As the experiment progresses, additional normal and homosexual subjects in unspecified numbers. All subjects to be supplied by the RCMP". The experimental procedure in Wake's proposal was straightforward enough: "the experimental stimuli will be pictures designed to elicit the subjects' interest in males and females...The first sixty subjects will be processed to determine the reaction patterns of normals and homosexuals. Then using these patterns as criteria, the experimenter will attempt to distinguish homosexuals presented by the RCMP, where nothing of the subject is known to the research team. Those methods proving successful will be retained for continuing research." Ultimately, the focus of Wake's research was to identify homosexual men and women by detecting "involuntary" sexual responses to the experimental stimuli (whether using pictures, presented words or audiotapes).
Ambitious as Wake's project was, it eventually bogged down over various technical snags. That included the difficulty in finding a large enough sample of actual homosexuals and “normal” men and women to establish the actual effectiveness of the machine. For obvious reasons, recruiting known homosexual men was hard enough (and the RCMP had no contacts at all in the female homosexual community as one rueful RCMP memo pointed out). Even getting heterosexual men and women to participate was also a stumbling block (the reputation of the "fruit machine" project was enough to scare off any would-be volunteers in the RCMP community, none of whom wanted to be branded as "fruits" by their responses to the stimuli). Since there were no female RCMP agents at the time, recruiting heterosexual women was deemed "inappropriate" (it was the early 1960s, after all). Even attempting to recruit test subjects from other government departments failed to provide the needed numbers that Wake called for in his proposal. There was also the operational problem of adapting the technology to adjust for height, eyeball size, and distance between eyeballs (all of which potentially distorted the machine's results).
Despite some progress, Wake's research project remained stalled for years before being eventually scrapped in 1967. For all the money spent and the years of effort, the great fruit machine project was a bust.
Continue to Part 3