On October 17, 1872, Major Harry Larkyns received an unexpected visitor.
A well-known bon vivant, drama critic, and traveler, Larkyns certainly had his share of friends (and enemies) dropping in on him without prior warning. Still, given that he was visiting the Yellow Jacket mine in Napa Country, Nevada at the time (he had some financial interests there), there was no advance warning of what was about to descent on him. On answering the door, Larkyns was confronted by a total stranger who simply stated, "Good evening, Major, my name is Muybridge and here's the answer to the letter you sent my wife." He then shot Larkyns at point blank range.
While the wound was serious, Larkyns was still able to retreat back into the house where he had been staying. Muybridge followed him in and was prepared to shoot Larkyns again when several of the other people staying in the house intervened. Larkyns died soon afterward. As for the man who shot him, he surrendered to mine officials without any argument and allowed himself to be taken into police custody. It was only after his arrest that he was identified as Eadweard Muybridge, a professional photographer who had already made a considerable name for himself with his magnificent photographs of Yosemite Valley. At the time, he had been working for the Bradley and Rulofson photography studio in San Francisco though his most illustrious contributions to photography would occur later in his future.
As for his motive in killing Larkyn, that apparently stemmed from Muybridge's recent marriage to 21-year-old Flora Shalcross Stone. Described by newspapers at the time as a "handsome woman of petite but plump figure", her marriage to Muybridge likely surprised most people given the age difference (he was 47 at the time). Despite doting on his new wife, he was still enraged after discovering that she had been in a long-time relationship with Major Larkyns. What made it even worse was that Larykns seemed determined to continue that relationship despite knowing about her new marriage.
There was also the question of Flora's son, Floraldo, born soon after her marriage to Muybridge and whether or not he had been fathered by Larkyns rather than Muybridge as assumed. Though Muybridge had already warned Larkyns off, any chance at domestic harmony ended when he discoveredv several graphic love letters that Larkyns had been foolish enough to send Flora. This precipitated an extremely emotional scene witnessed by his employer, William Herman Rulofson. As the venerable photographer would later tell police, Muybridge showed him parts of the letters that left no doubt that Flora had been unfaithful. He also appeared so distraught that Rulofson was afraid that he would kill either Flora or himself. Instead, having learned of Larkyns' whereabouts somehow, he immediately left San Francisco and traveled to Calistoga, Nevada and the nearby mine. The murder happened just hours later.
While awaiting trial for murder, Eadweard Muybridge and his defense counsel already began preparing his defense. Along with focusing on Flora's infidelity, the defense attorney, W.W. Prendergast had one more card left to play: a possible insanity plea based on a serious head injury that his client had sustained in an August, 1860 stagecoach accident. According to one newspaper description of the accident itself, "In his efforts to stop the horses, the driver drove out off the road, and they came in collision with a tree, literally smashing the coach in pieces, killing one man ... and injuringevery other person on the stage to a greater or less extent." As for Muybridge, he was thrown from the coach and struck a rock or a tree stump. Along with requiring months to recover, he was also left with a permanent gap in his memory relating to the accident and what happened afterward. The accident also left him with permanent impairments in his senses of taste and smell.
Though the exact nature of the head injury can't be determined (no diagnostic imaging in those days), later medical historians have suggested that Muybridge sustained permanent damage to the orbitofrontal cortex of his brain's frontal lobe. Along with the changes to his taste and smell, he would also demonstrate many of the other signs of this kind of injury seen in similar patients. This included increased aggression and impulsiveness as well as some of the other peculiar behaviour that he is recorded as displaying in the years that followed. For example, he would change the spelling of his name repeatedly, beginning with "Edward Muggeridge", then "Muggridge", "Muygridge" and eventually, "Muybridge" (his tombstone would later read "Maybridge"). It was also around this time that he changed his name from Edward to Eadweard.
Recognizing the affect that the accident had on him, Muybridge returned to England and arranged to see Dr. William Gull, prominent neurologist and Queen Victoria's personal physician. It was Dr. Gull who, recognizing the changes in his patient, first suggested that Muybridge become a photographer (he had been a bookseller up to then). Taking to this idea right away, he soon educated himself in the basics of photography, including the wet-collodion method that was the choice of most professionals in those days. He then returned to America and pursued his new career as a nature photographer. This included compiling spectacular footage of Yosemite and San Francisco which made him world-famous.
Then came his marriage to Flora, Floredo's birth, and the murder of Harry Larkyns...
While Muybridge emphatically rejected the idea of an insanity plea (he insisted that the murder had been completely justified), Prendergast prepared his case by calling a number of witnesses to testify how his client had changed after the accident. This included William Rulafson who told the court that he had seen Muybridge do "strange things ... during the period of his acquaintance with him. One thing was, that while Muybridge was a strictly honest man, he would make a bargain or contract with one at night and next morning go back on it in tote and make a new contract. " The witness said he could go on and " fill whole volumes with the peculiar things Muybridge had done . Among the strange freaks which Muybridge had committed was to have his picture taken on a rock at Yosemite valley, where a biscuit, if slightly tilted, would have fallen down 2,000 feet." Another witness, fellow photographer Silas Selleck, reported that, prior to the accident, Muybridge was "was active, energetic, strict in all his dealings, open and candid. When he came back he had changed entirely. He was eccentric, peculiar, and had the queerest of odd notions, so much so that he seemed like a different man." Other witnesses gave similar accounts when they were called to testify.
Ironically though, this testimony hardly mattered in the end. On February 6, 1875, the all-male jury flatly rejected any hint of insanity and ruled that the murder had been completely justifiable. This decision was apparently based completely on the "unwritten law" concerning a husband's right to avenge infidelity which had figured in numerous similar murder cases. According to one newspaper story about the verdict, "The jury discarded entirely the theory of insanity, and meeting the case on the bare issue left, acquitted the defendant on the ground that he was justified in killing Larkyns for seducing his wife. This was directly contrary to the charge of the Judge, but the jury do not mince the matter, or attempt to excuse the verdict. They say that if their verdict was not in accord with the law of the books, it is with the law of human nature; that, in short, under similar circumstances they would have done as Muybridge did, and they could not conscientiously punish him for doing what they would have done themselves."
Muybridge's reaction to the verdict was certainly memorable. In the same news story, "Mr. Pendegast caught him in his arms and thus prevented his falling to the floor, but his body was limp as a wet cloth. His emotion became convulsive and frightful. His eyes were glassy, his jaws set and his face livid. The veins of his hands and forehead swelled out like whipcord. He moaned and wept convulsively, but uttered no word of pain or rejoicing. Such a display of overpowering emotion has seldom, if ever, been witnessed in a Court of justice.... He rocked to and fro in his chair. His face was absolutely horrifying in its contortions as convulsion succeeded convulsion.... Pendegast begged Muybridge to control himself and thank the jurymen for their verdict. He arose to his feet, and tried to speak, but sank back in another convulsion. He was carried out of the room by Pendegast and laid on a lounge in the latter’s office."
Still, despite being a free man, Eadweard Muybridge had to deal with the damage the murder and trial had done to his career. Almost immediately after his acquittal, he went to Central America on another photography assignment leaving Flora and Floredo to fend for themselves. While Flora managed to get a divorce, the court was hardly favourable and, given the publicity surrounding her affair with Larkyns, had few prospects for the future. Whether or not this contributed to her death soon afterward is impossible to determine at this late date (no cause of death was ever given). In any event, Muybridge wasted little time in sending Floredo to a Catholic orphanage though, to be fair, he did pay for the child's upkeep. In any event, he had no further contact with his one-time son.
Muybridge himself soon returned from Central America and went on to establish himself as one of the great pioneers of nature and action photography. In fact, his work photographing horse gaits also made him one of the early pioneers in stop-motion animation as well. He was even one of the first to show movie pictures to a paying audience at the Chicago World's Columbian Exposition of 1893 which, along with his numerous books and lectures, helped cement his reputation. He retired soon afterward and returned to England to live his final years until his death in 1904.
As for Floredo, not much is known about him except that he worked most of his life as a ranch hand and gardener. Ironically enough, the few surviving photographs of him as an adult show a rather strong resemblance to Muybridge which may, or may not, have been coincidental. He died in 1944 at the age of seventy and his own opinion about his paternity, and the circumstances surrounding his being placed in an orphanage, are pretty much a mystery.
Did that long-ago accident play a role in Eadweard Muybridge's later life, including the murder of Harry Larkyns? Despite the evidence raised at his murder trial, it's hard to judge what changes resulted from his head injury based on what little medical data is available. Though a 2015 article in the journal Neurosurgical Focus raises some intriguing speculations, including exploring the possibility that his amazing artistic ability may have been due to atrophy in the orbitofrontal cortex. Other patients showing this kind of atrophy have developed new artistic abilities due to their reduced inhibition in expressing emotion through art. Neurological changes might also explain Muybridge's frequent risk-taking behaviour, including seeking out dangerous assignments and his willingness to take nude photographs of men and women (a scandalous practice in those more conservative times). Frontal lobe damage might also help explain his obsessive perfectionism which guided his photographic career.
Speculations aside, there is no disputing that Eadweard Muybridge's contributions revolutionized photography and paved the way for later developments in animation and cinematography. Whether or not it was a head injury helped transform an ordinary bookseller into an innovative (not to mention murderous) genius remains a mystery.